Multibody Mission Design with STK

관리자
2025-03-21
조회수 1020

0359db8007a45.png


The 3-body problem: an overview

• Libration points correspond to potential equilibrium in space: 5 solutions exist 

• True for any 3 body system

• Trajectories are highly nonlinear

- No general analytic solutions without assumptions

• Dynamical stability is important characteristic

- Measured using eigenvalues of STM

- More stable – lower stationkeeping cost

- Less stable – more transfer options

• Transfers between

- Look for connecting unstable/stable manifolds

22dd0b7b6f0b5.png

State Transition and Monodromy matrices

93d0331764b94.png


bbf0f659298dd.png


How are multibody trajectories different from near-Earth orbits?

Near Earth

• Earth gravity dominates

• Classical two-body orbit solutions take the form of conic sections (circles, ellipses, hyperbolas) 

• Design typically takes place in an inertial frame

• Real orbits differ slightly from ideal orbits

• Descriptive orbital elements

f444df3ddd586.png

Multibody

• Earth and other central body gravity are equally important (more or less)

• No general solutions exist. Behaviors vary greatly depending on locale

• Extremely sensitive to ICs -> need constraints

• In many cases, real orbits require frequent maintenance to retain identifying characteristics of ideal orbits

b3966522548a4.png


Ansys features for Multibody trajectory design

f008bc4789036.png


Some cislunar orbits using CR3BP

f516e9dfb233d.png


Mission to Libration Points: typical workflow

• Scenario set up:

- Set up geometric elements: 

• Libration Points

• Custom axes: 

• Earth Centred (Origin at Earth centre, X towards L4, Z normal to ecliptic plane)

• L4 centred (Origin at L4, ..)

- Set up transfer (TLI)

• Target parameters  (outgoing asymptote, RA Dec)

• Lunar swingby (B plane targeting)

- Set up corrections (TCMs)

• Target arrival conditions (plane crossing, Rmag, XYZ condition etc.) - Set up capture and maintenance burns (long term propagation)


9fad502ec705a.png


L1/L2 Transfer trajectory

9d32bcb505601.png


L4/L5: Transfer with Departure Asymptote

5c7a79198e2a7.png


Transfer with Lunar Swingby

3edce3af2e6a4.pngCould also perform B plane targeting of moon with BdotT and BdotR found through targeting L4 arrival conditions

The B plane

8d5b09e16208e.png


Stationkeeping

6e6bacd64ccb3.png


Real case references

https://astrogatorsguild.com/why-we-used-phasing-loops-on-ladee/

a5f4db6395b07.pnghttps://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/1008/Moon-mission-LADEE-arrives-after-an-amazingly-precise-looping-flight

51b431ab4cdc4.png

https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/nasas-lro-snaps-a-picture-of-nasas-ladee-spacecraft/

2b72a202af7e6.png


LRO  Chandrayaan-2 collision avoidance planned with STK

e15d212d58af0.png

https://www.wionews.com/india-news/explained-how-indias-lunar-orbiter-chandrayaan-2-avoided-collision-with-nasas-lro-429955


Debris in cislunar space – Chang’e 5 third stage

787340bedd01e.png